nullstream weblog

Apple Tablet This Week?

Apple

January 25, 2010 11:08 AM PST

Ok, the count down is on. Time to make your predictions. Let's see who can get the closest to the actual thing. This time around I'm trying to restrict my predictions to what I think it will have rather than what I want it to have.

Here is my overly detailed prediction:
[Updated to compare with actual]

Continue reading "Apple Tablet This Week?"...

Comments (8)

Don't discount Google's cloud storage just yet

Gooogly

January 12, 2010 10:09 PM PST

Today Google announced that cloud file storage was coming to Google Docs. After quickly reading the details, my first response (and pretty much everyone else's) was MEH. Only 1G for free with no local syncing? I'll stick with Dropbox, thank you very much. Seriously after all these many years of G-Drive rumors that was all they could come up with? But after some further though I think we may be missing the real potential here. I say 'potential' because this is only speculation, and may not be Google's intent, but hear me out.


Comparing this to DropBox is not fair. That is not where the real potential lies. In fact we don't need another DropBox. What we need is, well, cloud storage. Not a copy of all our locally generated content copied to the cloud, but rather one place to store all of our cloud generated content. Think about it, there is a general trend away from desktop and towards netbooks and web services. As we move more and more of our generated content to Web apps we have lost control of our files. They are sprayed all over different services and servers. I figure Google is in a position to fix that. Who better than Google to provide a nice open file storage API for any web service to use? Combine that with OpenID (via your existing Google account), and you have all your 'cloud' generated files centrally located, backed up, and securely under your control again. Brilliant. Of course they'll all be indexed by Google to provide targeted advertising, but we're already used to to that aren't we?

Am I right here? Is this were Google is going with this? Only time will tell.


Comments (0)

Streaming video to the iphone and ipod touch

iPhone

January 9, 2010 10:06 PM PST

When I switched away from Windows Mobile I left behind a lot of functionality, some built in and some via 3rd party apps. Over time Apple has managed to add some of these things to the platform, like cut and paste (duh!) and Bluetooth Stereo support. Gradually 3rd party apps have also appeared to fill in many of the cracks left by my switch. I found another one last night - Air Video

I used to use TCPMP or BetaPlayer to stream Xvid files from my media server to my PocketPC over WIFI. I gave this up when I switched to the Apple platform. The iPhone won't play anything but mp4 and I'm not about to convert all my vids. Also the iPhone doesn't have any native support for accessing a network share. Now that problem is solved with Air Video. Air Video allows you to stream video in almost any format to the iPhone. Since the iPhone only displays mp4 the video must be converted (transcoded). Luckily Air Video will do that for you - either by queuing up the conversion or by transcoding on the fly.

To use it you need to install a server program on your Mac or PC and point it to the folders you would like to share. The server software uses Bonjour so you don't need to configure any network settings. After it is up and running the iPhone Air Video app will find the local machine automagically. They also claim some support for streaming across the internet, but I haven't tried that. You can also share iTunes playlists.

There are two versions of the app, one pay  (2.99) and one free. The free version limits the number of items you can see in a folder, but otherwise behaves the same.

I downloaded the server and app and after a quick setup I was streaming anime in .mkv format to my iPhone. Initially I was not able to see the subtitles, but I found there was a beta version of the server. I installed it and the subtitles appeared.


Comments (0)

Phone

Intarweb

December 31, 2009 05:09 AM PST

How many people still have a land line, and why? I've been completely cell phone based since March 2004.

It feels weird to agree with luddites AT&T that forcing them to maintain the land line infrastructure with ever decreasing margins is a bad idea.


Comments (2)

Keep up with your reading using free tools

Hacking

December 29, 2009 02:14 PM PST

These days there's far too much to read and not enough time to read it. I'll show you a couple ways to keep up with your reading using some free tools that are readily available.

Here's a typical scenario: you're reading an article on the web and find a link to something else very interesting, so you open it in a new tab to read later. You keep going on like this and by the end of the day you have 20 tabs open. And this is just one machine, many of us use multiple computers as well as smart phones. How can you keep up with all this reading? The best trick that I found so far is to be able to push this reading into any 'free' time that I have scattered throughout my day. For example, when I'm waiting in lines, or waiting for meals, or people. I can also find time during ads or previews etc. During most of this time I'm not in front of my computer however, so the old 'tab' trick just won't cut it. My other favorite 'free' time however is while driving. I currently have quite a long commute, over 45 minutes each way. If you are creative you can use both of these types of idle time to conquer you reading list.

Continue reading "Keep up with your reading using free tools"...

Comments (1)

Maximum Vi

UberGeek

November 3, 2009 05:17 PM PST

maximumvi_480.jpg

You're gonna want a 30" monitor for maximum Vi usage.

Comments (0)

SSD (yay or nay)?

Hardware

October 16, 2009 12:42 AM PST

If you were to build a new PC today, what storage set up would you use? I'm thinking that the primary disk would have to be SSD for the start up and application launch performance. I wonder if a secondary SSD for compiling large projects (like Chrome) would be worth it? Would it be a good trade off for a laptop: faster disk but reduced capacity?

AnandTech has some great SSD write ups here and here.

Looks like the intel X25-M is the best choice, and you can get the 160 GB drive for $500 at amazon. That still seems a little pricey to me.


Comments (2)

The case against Apple

Apple

August 9, 2009 03:16 PM PST

The Case Against Apple-in Five Parts

The article is pretty good, but I really got a kick out of the comments. I found this one part way down:


If Microsoft managed the Windows PC world the way Apple manages the iPhone/iPod touch world, Apple’s revenue would be less than half of what it is today. Imagine:

Steve: Hi, we’ve just submitted the Windows version of our iTunes app to the Windows app store.

Bill: Interesting. It looks like it duplicates existing functionality of the Windows OS, which includes Windows Media Player. Rejected.

Steve: What? There are similarities, yes, but iTunes provides a clean, easy to use interface for managing, purchasing, and playing music. Further, it allows Windows users to connect their iPods to their PCs and sync their music library seamlessly.

Bill: Sorry, our policy still stands. Besides, third party applications aren’t allowed direct access to music stored on a user’s PC.

Steve: But then how will we revolutionize the portable media player market and the mobile phone market, boosting our Mac market share and making billions of dollars in the process?

Bill: You won’t.

I wonder what revolutionary apps/gear/services we’ll miss out on because Apple finds them inconvenient.

-lang

There are also some good comparisons betweens Microsoft's anti-trust case for 'including' I.E. and Apple's down right 'rejection' of competing browsers like Opera mobile.

I'm enjoying the negative press Apple is getting, because hey I'm sick that way. But in the end I just want them to open things up a bit, and stop being, you know, evil.

Before you spam me, let me state that I do realize that the iPhone is not an open platform and they have the right to do what ever they want with 'their' product. I think the point being made in the market however is that consumers really want it to be open. Now I'm no business major, but I think that sometimes, just sometimes, it is a good idea to give customers what they want.


Comments (3)

traceroute + ping = mtr

Hacking

August 5, 2009 01:35 PM PST

Matt at Twitter turned me on to using mtr. It's a mix of traceroute and ping, and produces a nice little list of where your packets are going.

The source tarball of mtr compiles fine on Mac OS X with a simple "make". I typically avoid "make install", and rather just copied the executable to /usr/sbin and did a setuid so it will run without typing "sudo" first.

$ wget ftp://ftp.bitwizard.nl/mtr/mtr-0.75.tar.gz
$ make
$ sudo cp mtr /usr/sbin
$ sudo chmod +s /usr/sbin/mtr
$ mtr www.google.com
                            My traceroute  [v0.75]
xxxxxxxx-macbook-pro.local (0.0.0.0)                  Wed Aug  5 13:19:34 2009
Keys:  Help   Display mode   Restart statistics   Order of fields   quit
                                       Packets               Pings
 Host                                Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
 1. 192.168.0.1                       0.0%    37    0.8   0.8   0.7   0.9   0.0
 2. xx.xxx.xx.xx                      0.0%    37    2.2   2.3   2.0   4.4   0.5
 3. xxx.xxx.xx.xxx                    2.7%    37    3.7   3.7   3.3   5.7   0.5
 4. xx.x.xxx.xxx                     11.1%    36    7.3  11.2   6.7  67.7  12.1
 5. xxxxxxxxxxx.sea.eschelon.com      8.3%    36    7.0   9.0   6.8  58.7   9.0
 6. xxx.xxx.xx.xx                     5.6%    36    7.3  12.4   7.0 102.7  16.9
 7. xxxxxxxxxx.sttlwawb.integra.net   2.8%    36    7.4  15.3   7.0 129.9  23.4
 8. six.sea01.google.com              5.6%    36    7.5  14.8   7.1  89.1  18.2
...
13. xxxxxxxxxx.google.com             5.6%    36   14.8  16.4  14.4  33.7   4.4

Yes, that is some packet loss :-)

Comments (2)

Suspend Firefox

Apple

July 30, 2009 10:08 PM PST

Firefox 3.5 does a bit better on memory usage with a lot of (50+) tabs. Still, the various Javascripts, Java and Flash animations all use CPU, and Firefox for me typically runs at 20% CPU or so on my Macbook Pro. There are a couple things you can do to reduce the CPU usage, and then the ultimate solution to quickly suspend Firefox.

Initially, you can install the Adblock Plus extension, which will block all ads, with the side effect of using less CPU loading and displaying flashing gifs, etc. Flashblock is another good extension that shows all flash objects as a blank rectangle with a play button in the center. The flash object will only load when the play button is pressed. You'd be surprised how many tiny flash objects are embedded pages, using CPU.

Finally, you can suspend the Firefox process and effectively move its CPU usage to 0%. I typically hit <command>-h to hide all Firefox windows, and then type the following to susupend and resume in Terminal.app:

killall -STOP firefox-bin
killall -CONT firefox-bin

It would be nice to integrate these commands when an app is hidden or shown, but for now this hack is good for saving battery life, or keeping your CPU cooler in hot weather!


Comments (10)

Amazon and Netflix

Media

July 14, 2009 08:32 PM PST

Netflix's stock is up following rumors that Amazon was in talks to acquire them.

As long as I can still stream unlimited amounts of crap movies from the 80's and 90's to my Xbox, I don't care.


Comments (1)

Apple Netbook This Fall?

Apple

July 14, 2009 08:29 PM PST

There have been some rumors lately about Apple releasing a netbook.

This would be an interesting device, if they did it, and I wonder what model they'd use for software? Would all Mac OS X applications just run, or would they try to use an AppStore model with a new SDK designed specifically for it? After all, a device like that would have limited screen real estate, an accelerometer and a virtual keyboard... not many main stream Mac applications would be pleasantly shoe-horned into it. iPhone applications might assume a specific screen size, and might not look so great on a much larger screen.

Apple doesn't seem to make many niche products these days (Apple TV seems to be the exception), with their very clearly segmented Mac products, iPods and iPhones.

Still, I'd buy one just for web access at home while watching TV or lying in bed. Imagine if it could read Kindle books, too... could be cool.


Comments (8)